tobyink: Might be nice to have a note at the top of this page saying "DO NOT BUILD APPS ON TOP OF THIS. USE SPARQL INSTEAD." or words to that effect.
danbri: This is not widely cited as an 'rdf query' spec. Is it really what they've implemented?
danbri: Use the source luke!
danbri: Send them a patch someone?
danbri: This is not widely cited as an 'rdf query' spec. Is it really what they've implemented?
danbri: Use the source luke!
danbri: Send them a patch someone?
danbri: "Supports both free text search (like Beagle/Google) as well as structured searches using RDF Query."
danbri: Via Edd Dumbill
danbri: Anyone tried it?
tobyink: Why does it use a bizarre XML query format rather than SPARQL?
danbri: Via Edd Dumbill
danbri: Anyone tried it?
tobyink: Why does it use a bizarre XML query format rather than SPARQL?
danbri: Is this the latest word on rdf/xml parsing in js? Or anything later i should look at?
tobyink: I'm interested in the first column of the table.
tobyink: CURIEs as labels
tobyink: rdfs:labels as labels
Anchakor: IMHO the rdfs:label one, but best would be to pick one but make the other available too :) (rdf browsers/editor where are you?! :))
tobyink: CURIEs as labels
tobyink: rdfs:labels as labels
Anchakor: IMHO the rdfs:label one, but best would be to pick one but make the other available too :) (rdf browsers/editor where are you?! :))