DanC: by connolly on Fri, 2007-03-23
mhausenblas: hm, should consider going in that direction a bit more for voiD 2.0 ?
mhausenblas: thoughts? comments? leave at http://identi.ca/group/void a comment or void-rdfs-internals[AT]googlegroups.com
mhausenblas: thoughts? comments? leave at http://identi.ca/group/void a comment or void-rdfs-internals[AT]googlegroups.com
mhausenblas: SemTech09 tutorial - in case you're around on Monday, June 15, 2009 ... chime in ;)
chimezie: Relative URI references for deployability v.s. Associating explicit base URIs with ontologies, round one: fight!