LeeF: Three SPARQL specifications published as W3C Recommendations
LeeF: Contains links to specifications, press release, and testimonials
LeeF: Contains links to specifications, press release, and testimonials
bijan: At the first F2F, the OWL WG decided to take up the cause of specing keys and compound keys as was being explored but the OWLED DatabasEsque features task force
bijan: They are currently defined by a translation to first order logic, but the translated axioms are notational variants of DL Safe SWRL rules. I believe that in the case of RDFS kbs (assuming only disjointness of types reasoning) that the ground entailments should be the same as with most Datalog inspired rules systems
bijan: We introduce new syntax, for which we haven't yet provided an RDF Mapping (input welcome).
bijan: This is currently merely a proposal to the WG. The WG has not agreed to the proposal or even that EasyKeys will be in the spec.
bijan: They are currently defined by a translation to first order logic, but the translated axioms are notational variants of DL Safe SWRL rules. I believe that in the case of RDFS kbs (assuming only disjointness of types reasoning) that the ground entailments should be the same as with most Datalog inspired rules systems
bijan: We introduce new syntax, for which we haven't yet provided an RDF Mapping (input welcome).
bijan: This is currently merely a proposal to the WG. The WG has not agreed to the proposal or even that EasyKeys will be in the spec.
bengee: an rdf-based who is who
bengee: apparently bootstrapped from dbpedia, although dbpedia's rdf dumps are prolly still easier on the eyes than the tinfinger site ;)
bengee: apparently bootstrapped from dbpedia, although dbpedia's rdf dumps are prolly still easier on the eyes than the tinfinger site ;)
hendler: my puff piece in IEEE Computer about Sem Web and "Web 3.0"
hendler: comments welcome
hendler: (I'm not sure about access to this - hope it is open, but I'm getting some weird IP-based passthrough)
hendler: comments welcome
hendler: (I'm not sure about access to this - hope it is open, but I'm getting some weird IP-based passthrough)
bijan: Interesting...this is the first time I've heard of a team submission.
bijan: My first thought is that I don't get, from the title, how this relates to Turtle
bijan: Ah I see: "Turtle is another subset, for only expressing RDF. It is like n3-rdf below except that it does not have the path syntax. It is a subejct of a searate document."
bijan: Hmm. Then I think the title is misleading, since N3 is not merely an RDF Syntax, but a syntax for an extended RDF.
bijan: (Note, all this Bijanic commentary was due to the fact that his fingers thing the F-key is the same as the B-key)
bijan: Oh, I see there are quite a few http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/ team submissions. I had no idea.
bijan: The http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2000/10/swap/grammar/n3.n3 grammar link 404s......
bijan: And it's a BNF in N3...not sure how wise it is to have the bootstrap spec in the language being speced...I see they acknowledge that and give 4 other formats...all which 404 :)
bijan: My first thought is that I don't get, from the title, how this relates to Turtle
bijan: Ah I see: "Turtle is another subset, for only expressing RDF. It is like n3-rdf below except that it does not have the path syntax. It is a subejct of a searate document."
bijan: Hmm. Then I think the title is misleading, since N3 is not merely an RDF Syntax, but a syntax for an extended RDF.
bijan: (Note, all this Bijanic commentary was due to the fact that his fingers thing the F-key is the same as the B-key)
bijan: Oh, I see there are quite a few http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/ team submissions. I had no idea.
bijan: The http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2000/10/swap/grammar/n3.n3 grammar link 404s......
bijan: And it's a BNF in N3...not sure how wise it is to have the bootstrap spec in the language being speced...I see they acknowledge that and give 4 other formats...all which 404 :)
danbri: Some time later, we have OPTIONAL and GRAPH ...