timbl: WBUR On Point: Net Neutrality - Tom Ashbrook
timbl: Many anti-netrality PR people misrepresent the NN argument completely: "But we have always had to pay more for better service!" . Duh. That is not the point at all. It's whether if I pay for a given level of service p and you pay for another level q that we get connectivity at min(p,q), No one I know is arguing you shouldn't pay more for better service. It is about nondiscrimination. We pay for connecting to th
timbl: ... the Net as a cloud. The phrase "tiered" is not helping, not well defined.
timbl: Many anti-netrality PR people misrepresent the NN argument completely: "But we have always had to pay more for better service!" . Duh. That is not the point at all. It's whether if I pay for a given level of service p and you pay for another level q that we get connectivity at min(p,q), No one I know is arguing you shouldn't pay more for better service. It is about nondiscrimination. We pay for connecting to th
timbl: ... the Net as a cloud. The phrase "tiered" is not helping, not well defined.
danbri: For the W3C Content Label Incubator Group discussions.
danbri: Also potentially a very real-world RIF use case.
danbri: Also potentially a very real-world RIF use case.