Welcome to the
Semantic Web Interest Group
scratchpad generated automatically from discussions on
IRC at
Freenode channel #swig 2001-2018 approx
by the chump bot.
bijan: Well, a bit more than that. bijan: There are similar refrains. bijan: For me, the smallest fix that would help is a suggestion I made during the second LC (though, IIRC, not as a formal comment; dumb me!). bijan: Add an element name, rdf:arc, rdf:attribute, rdf:predicate, what have you bijan: and an associated attribute, rdf:arc_name, whatever bijan: This would allow for an N-Triples-in-RDF serialization that would 1) allow RDF/XML to serialize all legal rdf graphs (I think) and 2) be DTD or XML Schemaable, thus better composable with other XML formats. bijan: Implementation in current parsers is pretty simple so long as they already warn about extensions to the RDF namespace and can be done as a preprocessing step bijan: It wouldn't be pretty, but it would be a step :)
bijan: There are similar refrains.
bijan: For me, the smallest fix that would help is a suggestion I made during the second LC (though, IIRC, not as a formal comment; dumb me!).
bijan: Add an element name, rdf:arc, rdf:attribute, rdf:predicate, what have you
bijan: and an associated attribute, rdf:arc_name, whatever
bijan: This would allow for an N-Triples-in-RDF serialization that would 1) allow RDF/XML to serialize all legal rdf graphs (I think) and 2) be DTD or XML Schemaable, thus better composable with other XML formats.
bijan: Implementation in current parsers is pretty simple so long as they already warn about extensions to the RDF namespace and can be done as a preprocessing step
bijan: It wouldn't be pretty, but it would be a step :)