danbri: Comments welcome (ideally on the TF list, but here is fine too).
danbri: I used some slightly redundant idioms to keep it OWL DL happy (according to the Mindswap Pellet tool) while also working for those who only use RDF/S. eg. a class that's both rdfs:Class and owl:Class. Is that tricky really ok?
danbri: I used some slightly redundant idioms to keep it OWL DL happy (according to the Mindswap Pellet tool) while also working for those who only use RDF/S. eg. a class that's both rdfs:Class and owl:Class. Is that tricky really ok?