sh1m: Explains some stuff surrounding IFP
DanC: hmm... I got the impression they're having a conference in New England next week, but I can't find it
mattb: is the assertion here that RDF can't help solve real-world nameclash problems a correct one?
mattb: while I fully support the involvement of humans in any process that involves creativity, it's an interesting question
mattb: See discussion
mattb: while I fully support the involvement of humans in any process that involves creativity, it's an interesting question
mattb: See discussion
danbri: I took eg from the rdf syntax spec, fed it to the RDF validator.
DanC: This latest group chat protocol uses browsing for the discovery of group chat features available. seems analagous to /list in IRC
DanC: Two IQ namespaces are used to deliver group chat functionality here: jabber:iq:conference and jabber:iq:browse. ugh. jabber: URIs. jabber is in the IETF now, yes? I should be able to get that fixed...
DanC: hmm... IETF XMPP WG charter
DanC: hmm... IANA list of official URI schemes lists im and pres but not jabber:
DanC: sent a comment on jabber: to the list, but I gather you have to subscribe to post. sigh. my copy to uri@w3.org made it.
DanC: hmm... shouldn't having written an RFC get me rights to send mail to any IETF WG mailing list? that would be cool.
DanC: I mean: after all, my email address goes in the RFC as spam target for all eternity. This seems the least they could do in return.