golbeck: I've finally caught up with myself and updated the trust file generator, trust-o-matic, to encode email addresses using sha1sum
golbeck: You can also submit FOAF files that use sha1sum
golbeck: We are up to 867 people in the network, with over 1000 trust ratings assigned.
golbeck: Thanks again to everyone who has helped so far.
golbeck: You can also submit FOAF files that use sha1sum
golbeck: We are up to 867 people in the network, with over 1000 trust ratings assigned.
golbeck: Thanks again to everyone who has helped so far.
danbri: I've pulled in a list of all the things proposed I'd like to find time for, not fully mangled into an agenda yet.
danbri: Feedback welcomed.
danbri: Feedback welcomed.
golbeck: The trust project at mindswap has been upgraded to understand and process foaf files with mbox_sha1sum
golbeck: Expect all trust-o-matic entries to be sha1sum based by the middle of this week
golbeck: Any FOAF files that contain trust ratings and sha1sum encodings that are submitted at http://trust.mindswap.org/trustSubmit.shtml should now be reflected in the network
golbeck: Thanks again to everyone who has been helping with the project. -Jen
golbeck: Expect all trust-o-matic entries to be sha1sum based by the middle of this week
golbeck: Any FOAF files that contain trust ratings and sha1sum encodings that are submitted at http://trust.mindswap.org/trustSubmit.shtml should now be reflected in the network
golbeck: Thanks again to everyone who has been helping with the project. -Jen
golbeck: Stats can be viewed at the To Ten page: http://trust.mindswap.org/cgi-bin/topTen.cgi
golbeck: You'll have to beat out my mom, though (currently stable at 100 ratings)
golbeck: For help, try the address book conversion script at http://trust.mindswap.org/abScript.shtml
golbeck: Which will start you into a trust-o-matic system based on the addresses in your addressbook (or any other plain text file)
danbri: What definition of 'trust'? (maybe I'm missing a page/link?). "Email addresses of people you trust or distrust" seems a little underconstraining.
golbeck: Jim and I have said for now, consider it how much you trust a person to send you a "good" email