karlcow: Or why RDF has made our life easier.
karlcow: first XSLT used to start the rdf version from the xml
karlcow: first XSLT used to start the rdf version from the xml
DanC: nifty!
DanC: e.g. schema checker results for the RDF calendar schema
libby: there are a few bugs - it fails stupdly if the xml/RDF is invalid
DanC: e.g. schema checker results for the RDF calendar schema
libby: there are a few bugs - it fails stupdly if the xml/RDF is invalid
libby: see action libby, and email to RDFcalendar and wiki page
mortenf: see also reply from mortenf that has yet to make it to the list
libby: ACTION libby summarise this discussion and send to www-rdf-interest
mortenf: see also reply from mortenf that has yet to make it to the list
libby: ACTION libby summarise this discussion and send to www-rdf-interest
libby: see action libby
DanC: hmm... we agreed on a design for taking X- properties into RDF... but what about the other direction?
libby: continued
DanC: hmm... we agreed on a design for taking X- properties into RDF... but what about the other direction?
libby: continued
libby: Wednesday, 2003-08-20, 1600UTC
libby: last meeting's weblog, logs
DanC: Dan Connolly attending
libby: libby miller attending
mortenf: Morten attending
DanC: see also rdf-calendar list archive, RdfCalendar wiki topic and RDF Calendar Workspace
libby: next meeting 2003-09-10, 16-00UTC (provisional)
libby: last meeting's weblog, logs
DanC: Dan Connolly attending
libby: libby miller attending
mortenf: Morten attending
DanC: see also rdf-calendar list archive, RdfCalendar wiki topic and RDF Calendar Workspace
libby: next meeting 2003-09-10, 16-00UTC (provisional)
danbri: W3C's mailing lists are currently bogged down thanks to this pest.
DanC: RMX records please!
DanC: RMX records please!