earle: for the record
sbp`: On the surface of it, it's just Yet Another Alternate RDF/XML Serialization Attempt, but it's also a challenge to get people to stop criticizing RDF/XML and to actually produce alternatives if they think that they can
sbp`: This approach, if you haven't already guessed from the title, bases itself on N-Triples, but adds some XML functionality. There are no parsers yet, and there are probably huge flaws with the idea, but I think that it's worth getting out there
sbp`: This approach, if you haven't already guessed from the title, bases itself on N-Triples, but adds some XML functionality. There are no parsers yet, and there are probably huge flaws with the idea, but I think that it's worth getting out there
dajobe: ignore Butlers's stupid griping link
dajobe: although I did enjoy him knocking HP's own ARP parser as being too slow, therefore RDF is doomed
dajobe: although I did enjoy him knocking HP's own ARP parser as being too slow, therefore RDF is doomed
mdupont: thanks to danbri for the help
mortenf: Actual ontology document is 404, though