sbp: "the syntax and semantics of semantic interpretation tags that can be added to speech recognition grammars to compute information to return to an application on the basis of rules and tokens that were matched by the speech recognizer" from abstract
sbp: TimBL: I wonder whether anyone has looked at whether this should be/could be generating RDF
sbp: TimBL: I think the idean is that if you ahve a converation to order a pizza, the output is details of that order and of the pizza.
sbp: TimBL: I wonder whether anyone has looked at whether this should be/could be generating RDF
sbp: TimBL: I think the idean is that if you ahve a converation to order a pizza, the output is details of that order and of the pizza.
AaronSw: "A group with the goal to publish a requirements documenent which determines the requirements from a Web Services perspective"
AaronSw: On YahooGroups, closed archives, restricted membership -- this makes me worry.
AaronSw: On www-archive, Dan Connolly explains why this is "a little tricky".
AaronSw: I'm not even sure what Web Services has to do with WebOnt...
AaronSw: On YahooGroups, closed archives, restricted membership -- this makes me worry.
AaronSw: On www-archive, Dan Connolly explains why this is "a little tricky".
AaronSw: I'm not even sure what Web Services has to do with WebOnt...
sbp: :A filter experiment - uses CWM to sniff out disagreements between parties in EARL documents
timbl: "the syntax and semantics of semantic interpretation tags that can be added to speech recognition grammars to compute information to return to an application on the basis of rules and tokens that were matched by the speech recognizer" from abstract
timbl: I wonder whether anyone has looked at whether this should be/could be generating RDF
timbl: I think the idean is that if you ahve a converation to order a pizza, the output is details of that order and of the pizza.
sbp: Er... labelling mix up. Ignore the comments above
DanC: nifty
DanC: sorta begging to use {} and such... hmm...
bijan: Very interesting!
sbp: The problem is, we sorta decided on using XML RDF normatively, and there isn't a strict {} => XML RDF conversion (just log:Quote)
DanC: quite.
bijan: Be nice if there were an XML serialization for {} in the spirit of the RDF/XML (N3/XML anyone?).
sbp: cf. rdfms-context in RDF Issues Tracking
timbl: "the syntax and semantics of semantic interpretation tags that can be added to speech recognition grammars to compute information to return to an application on the basis of rules and tokens that were matched by the speech recognizer" from abstract
timbl: I wonder whether anyone has looked at whether this should be/could be generating RDF
timbl: I think the idean is that if you ahve a converation to order a pizza, the output is details of that order and of the pizza.
sbp: Er... labelling mix up. Ignore the comments above
DanC: nifty
DanC: sorta begging to use {} and such... hmm...
bijan: Very interesting!
sbp: The problem is, we sorta decided on using XML RDF normatively, and there isn't a strict {} => XML RDF conversion (just log:Quote)
DanC: quite.
bijan: Be nice if there were an XML serialization for {} in the spirit of the RDF/XML (N3/XML anyone?).
sbp: cf. rdfms-context in RDF Issues Tracking
sbp: cf. todot.n3 and all.n3
sbp: Run: TARGET=all.n3; cwm todot.n3 --think --strings > out.n3
sbp: It's strings plural, not singular
sbp: Great stuff: might start hacking on an RDF => XHTML conversion thing, and perhaps EARL => XHTML... the possibilities!
sbp: cf. Discussion just above 2001-12-06 21-50 in #rdfig