AaronSw: I agree that this would be useful, but would seriously break compatibility
AaronSw: Perhaps for RDF 2.0?
SethR: however it gives us what we need to put context in the model
AaronSw: Perhaps for RDF 2.0?
SethR: however it gives us what we need to put context in the model
DanC: by C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 17 April 1996
DanC: on the interpretation of metadata descriptions as existentially quantified conjunctions.
DanC: on the interpretation of metadata descriptions as existentially quantified conjunctions.
AaronSw: Please vote to decide whether RSS 1.0 gets to keep the RSS name
AaronSw: For members of the syndication list
DanC: you gotta be in the syndication yahoo group
AaronSw: which you can join in web-only mode (i.e. not receive any mail)
AaronSw: For members of the syndication list
DanC: you gotta be in the syndication yahoo group
AaronSw: which you can join in web-only mode (i.e. not receive any mail)
jonb-h: propose that we dispense with reification
AaronSw: First we have to understand the problems with reification
AaronSw: Then we can look at some proposals for reforming RDF
jonb-h: And abstract syntax
AaronSw: we might even use daml:collection syntax
AaronSw: First we have to understand the problems with reification
AaronSw: Then we can look at some proposals for reforming RDF
jonb-h: And abstract syntax
AaronSw: we might even use daml:collection syntax
DanC_: available as DAML/RDF
DanC_: interesting as a basis for rdf-calendar stuff?
DanC_: hmm... cyc #$Collections don't obey the traditional extensionality axiom for sets; cycl collections can have the same members without being equal.
DanC_: interesting as a basis for rdf-calendar stuff?
DanC_: hmm... cyc #$Collections don't obey the traditional extensionality axiom for sets; cycl collections can have the same members without being equal.
SethR: for more on 'represents' see Semiosis
SethR: for more on 'represents' see Semiosis
SethR: container structures in graph are contexts