yy[Z]: could use a UML notation without altering the meaning
SethR: anybody know of a more well developed schema around ?
dajobe: Dan's presentation above describes this in (darn, a slide with no link) named "RDF data mode: details"
dajobe: The "What is RDF, really?" slide contains a good set of words for doing that in a 'sentence'
dajobe: The "What is RDF, really?" slide contains a good set of words for doing that in a 'sentence'
DanC: gonna try this for dumping my palm datebook as RDF
yy[Z]: The following slide exhibits m,p,p3p, and g
DanC: has done some UML stuff
yy[Z]: hates reading web pages about unfinished concepts by gurus with thier heads in the clouds (self-inclusive)
yy[Z]: finds that every time he asks for clarification of one rdf-for-dummies page he receives yet another referal to an equally ambiguous page
yy[Z]: hates reading web pages about unfinished concepts by gurus with thier heads in the clouds (self-inclusive)
yy[Z]: finds that every time he asks for clarification of one rdf-for-dummies page he receives yet another referal to an equally ambiguous page
DanC: Dec 2000, Version 0.1 Drew McDermott
DanC: just wanted to bookmark it; seems relevant to his recent post on reification
DanC: just wanted to bookmark it; seems relevant to his recent post on reification
dajobe: The SW is now part of Helsinki University of Technology syllabus...
danbri: some quick notes and toy example on identifying co-reference in rdf/uri-based systems
DanC: interesting discussion of the issues, but I can't tell if it's mostly a question or mostly an answer.
DanC: interesting discussion of the issues, but I can't tell if it's mostly a question or mostly an answer.
edd: And the matrix of topic mappers gets more tangled.
nmg: Advanced Knowledge Technologies
DanC: never mind
chaals: An example - actually the second item of the day for today (see below :)
chaals: This is what I would like to be able to do.
chaals: This is what I would like to be able to do.
chaals: sort of a poor people's Xlink collector