Welcome to the
Semantic Web Interest Group
scratchpad generated automatically from discussions on
IRC at
Freenode channel #swig 2001-2018 approx
by the chump bot.
DanC: 24th, 25th and 26th September, 2003, Santa Clara, California, USA DanC: browsing position papers... DanC: "While we expect to see non-standard binary forms used internally within certain vendors? implementations, including perhaps our own, we are not yet convinced that there is justification to standardize an interchange format other than XML 1.x." says Conner and Mendelsohn of IBM dajobe: the ExpWay position, html in a zip (sigh! they love their binary) ponders future work on binary formats for RDF "that is fast, easily fragmentable, and easy to index (preferably in ways that are harder with such storage methods as RDBMSs). Current ongoing work from various parties on addressing the mismatch between trees and graphs ma dajobe: ... may unlock possibilities for integration in that domain, and we will be glad to explore solutions in that space again."
DanC: browsing position papers...
DanC: "While we expect to see non-standard binary forms used internally within certain vendors? implementations, including perhaps our own, we are not yet convinced that there is justification to standardize an interchange format other than XML 1.x." says Conner and Mendelsohn of IBM
dajobe: the ExpWay position, html in a zip (sigh! they love their binary) ponders future work on binary formats for RDF "that is fast, easily fragmentable, and easy to index (preferably in ways that are harder with such storage methods as RDBMSs). Current ongoing work from various parties on addressing the mismatch between trees and graphs ma
dajobe: ... may unlock possibilities for integration in that domain, and we will be glad to explore solutions in that space again."